Deficit Politics
Over the past 5 years several political factors have
created a significantly larger deficit.
- Tax Cuts During War Time - Running up large
deficits during times of war is a historically acceptable policy. National
Security is generally agreed to be well worth the cost. However, in the past,
taxes generally were not reduced coincidentally with an increase in war
expenditures. President George W. Bush and Congress broke that trend by
fighting the “War on Terrorism” and cutting taxes thereby drastically
increasing the federal deficit. The President is currently pushing to extend
his tax cuts past the 2010 expiration date, despite surges in defense
spending. If there continues to be a sufficient political imperative to
maintain this fiscal disconnect, the war poses a significant political
hindrance to addressing the deficit crisis.
- Surplus - During the early 1990’s, the federal
budget deficit was considered a pressing issue. This allowed for the
formation of a political consensus in favor of a balanced budget. As a result
measures were taken to address the issue. Cuts in federal spending were
instituted under The Budget Enforcement Act in addition to rules placed on
discretionary spending known as PAYGO. These cuts in spending along with the
new spending restrictions led first to a balanced budget, and later a surplus
during the second term of President Bill Clinton. However, aware of this
surplus, Congress increased their spending. This new spending exhausted the
surplus. After this point, new spending persisted, adding to the deficit.
We have noted that problems arise when the budget is not
balanced following economic recovery. Currently, the Republican Party is
holding steadfast in their efforts to make President Bush’s tax cuts permanent.
While the tax cuts may have been effective in stimulating funding our economic
recovery, their current effect is that of enlarging the cyclically adjusted
federal budget deficit. The Republican Party’s opposition to tax increases is
perpetuating this result, and thus poses another political obstacle to deficit
solutions.
|